Showing posts with label Entertainment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Entertainment. Show all posts

Monday, January 6, 2014

Movie Review – The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug



Movie Review – The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug
In the middle of “The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug” – or should I say, a smaller part stitched out of a bigger picture for cinematic convenience – there is a shining love story between a dwarf and an elf; make that literally shining, with color blooms and halos. The elf is a royal warrior Tauriel (Evangeline Lilly), an original invention of director Peter Jackson and writers Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens and Guillermo del Toro, and akin to most moviemaking liberties Mr. Jackson takes with J.R.R. Tolkien’s material the addition of one lonesome character, and a small love story, is a welcome breather amongst a lot of running, slicing and dicing.
“The Desolation of Smaug” follows up “The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey”, where Mr. Jackson takes the long scenic route to set-up Mr. Tolkien’s less applauded characters with some background support from key players from “The Lord of the Rings”. Those faces, along with the resonating, sweeping trademark score from Howard Shore are intentionally replaced by a lot of actual sweeping. For a good number of scenes Mr. Jackson (and his regular cinematographer, the Oscar winning Andrew Lesine) wooshes the camera across impossible to place positions – dangling from over the top fixtures, speeding through low angles, imprudently edited location establishing shots, and even between peoples’ conversations. The fanatical drive to add hyper-dynamism to an already grim – and overly CGI crowded movie – is headache inducing and amateurish.
Mr. Jackson, who runs through most of “The Desolation of Smaug”, from one action sequence to the other, consigns some dramatics into his hero’s journey: Bilbo Baggins (Martin Freeman), and a company of dwarves led by Thorin Oakenshield (a semi-gruff Richard Armitage) and Gandalf the Grey (Ian McKellen), travel to Lonely Mountain Erebor, to kill the dragon Smaug (Benedict Cumberbatch) and reclaim their land (or to be precise, their mountain and mines). On their way, unlike Mr. Jackson’s other Tolkien middle picture “The Two Towers”, there is very slight prominence to his semi-important characters. (There are exceptions: one is a local town anti-government trader named Bard, played with somberness and severity by Luke Evans; the other is Elven King, Thranduil, played by Lee Pace, who hams it up as if he’s playing a self-centered fashionista).
About 6 hours into “The Hobbit” now, I’m still unable to pinpoint who-is-who in the dwarves. Instead of working them up, the screenplay substitutes Legolas (Orlando Bloom) as a zipping, Olympic-level gymnast elf-of-action, capable of taking down a horde of Orcs without messing up his hair.
A point to be noted, is that Legolas isn’t a part of The Hobbit books (he is fleetingly mentioned), however his appendage – and that of Tauriel – buffs up and unstiffens “The Desolation of Smaug” from its one-point agenda (there are some more liberties, spun-out but held back because they will play-out in “To There and Back Again”, due out next year).
At times, however, there are just too many distractions in “The Desolation of Smaug”; while the dragon, with Mr. Cumberbatch’s hypnotic, imposing, voice is one of the finest flying horrors of his movie-brethren (including Sean Connery’s Draco from “Dragonheart”), the overdrive of CG (including the Orcs, who were aesthetically better when people in make-up played them), fake action and the high frame rate of 48 frames per second (as compared to 24 frames per second, the usual norm), makes every shot seem like it is plucked out of a nex-gen video game, and not the plausible reality Mr. Jackson had worked so hard to create the last time.
I believe Mr. Jackson needs to take a step back and look at the bigger picture: the grandeur of Mr. Tolkien’s works, and Mr. Jackson’s own originality, is muscular enough to stand on its own without newfangled cinematic shenanigans – no matter if its looks good on paper, or in his imagination.
Released by Warner Bros. “The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug” is rated PG-13 for intense action, including beheading of fake fantasy creatures.
Directed by Peter Jackson; Produced by Mr. Jackson, Carolynne Cunningham, Zane Weiner, and Ms. Walsh; Written by Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens, Guillermo del Toro and Mr. Jackson (based on the novel by J. R. R. Tolkien); Cinematography by Andrew Lesnie; Edited by Jabez Olssen; Music by Howard Shore.
Starring: Ian McKellen, Martin Freeman, Richard Armitage, Benedict Cumberbatch (as the voice of Smaug), Evangeline Lilly, Lee Pace, Luke Evans, Stephen Fry, Ken Stott, James Nesbitt, Orlando Bloom and Mikael Persbrandt, amongst others.
Reviewed by: 

Read More

Saturday, September 7, 2013

Shuddh Desi Romance - Movie Reviews


Story: One loverboy and two lovely ladies. Live-in, walk out, make-up, makeout. In turns. Not necessarily in that order. Confused about love and marriage, they follow their heart (at times) and all that lies in between (pun!).

Review: So there, Bollywood breaks the stereotype. It steps out from behind the bloomin' trees in tulip fields and comfortably 'shacks-up' with the times. Here 'smooch-at-first-sight' happens in a bus-full with baaratis. Coffee dates are sipped in bed (Happy Endings? Huh!). Commitment is not the criteria. Marriage is not on the cards. And sexual compatibility is high priority. Yes, welcome to a modern day shuddh romance in desiland. Plenty 'Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang', tucked in with some emotion and drama too.

Raghu-(Sushant)-the-Romeo is a tourist guide in Jaipur, who also doubles up as rental baraati for Goyal (Rishi), a shaadi planner. He meets the rebellious Gayatri (Parineeti) and feels a "tezwala" attraction towards her. They waste no time in moving in, and making out. Soon, they're love-addicts, but commitment-phobic. The third character in this threesome (don't expect any of that) is Tara (Vaani), who was supposed to wed Raghu, until he fled on his wedding day. She makes a re-entry for revenge, but ends up with a complicated status, really.

Sushant swings between the Patiala-clad women and makes for the perfectly confused, charming and lovable Romeo. His hair perfectly styled at all times (though he should have had the 'out-of-bed' look more often), his clothes are more designer than dehati, but he more than makes up for it with his desicool performance.

Parineeti is a phataka, firing dialogues (smoking up too) and living it up. She makes the character her own, complementing Sushant with a casualness that's commendable. Newbie Vaani is impressive, pretty and commands a good screen-presence. Rishi Kapoor, blows you away yet again with his incredible histrionics.

Maneesh Sharma's 'SDR' has a 'Band Bajaa Baraat' blend, but the essence lies in the conversational chemistry between the characters, some beautifully captured moments and slice-of-life scenes. He doesn't play safe, which is good, but the second half seems repetitive. The concept is engaging, but the plot is little shudd, little desi and quite confused.

Reviewed by: Madhureeta Mukherjee
Courtesy: www.indiatimes.com
Read More

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Madras Cafe , An Unusual Thriller - Tanveer Khadim

If Shah Rukh Khan-Deepika Padukone starrer ‘Chennai Express’ (released on Aug 8, 2013) has utterly disappointed you than the unconventional ‘Madras Café’ (released on Aug 23, 2013) will surely provide you with some quality and reasonable cinema.

Director Shoojit Sircar, famous for films like Yahaan and Vicky Donor, endeavored to revolutionize the Indian cinematic world with an unusual political, spy, suspense thriller. He selected an entirely different and unique subject – the assassination of a former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi in 1991.

Without disturbing the essence of the subject, Sircar has intertwined a little bit fiction into the historical incidents, and creatively avoided to be biased or over-sensitive. This sort of fusion made his film an enjoyable experience.

Although it is apparent that vast research was undertaken by the director Sircar and producer John Abraham, much of the plot is fiction and inspired by actual historical events, for instance, the deployment of the Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF) in Sri Lanka under the consent of Indo-Sri Lankan Accord (1987) to neutralize the Tamil nationalists. Following Rajiv Gandhi’s defeat in 1989’s elections; new PM V. P. Singh ordered the pullout of IPKF, which was completed in 1990. Ex-PM Rajiv Gandhi, who signed the accord to send IPKF, was assassinated by a woman suicide bomber during an election campaign in Tamil Nadu on May 21, 1991.

Set against this backdrop of the Sri Lankan civil war and Indian political upheaval of late 80s and early 90s, Madras Café outlines the histories of the two neighbours and actions of Indian intelligence agency R&AW from the perspective of an Indian army officer Major Vikram (John Abraham) who was conducting covert operations in Jaffna after the withdrawal of IPKF. There he meets a foreign war journalist Jaya (Nargis Fakhri) who was finding the reality of the civil war. Vikram also exposes a conspiracy to assassinate Ex-PM of India.

The nicely-connected incidents as well as swirling puzzles will not permit you to loose concentration from the tenacious, gloomy and subdued tone of the movie. The script played a vital role in holding the gigantic and challenging representation without noticeable blemishes. Major events and all names have been changed in order to avoid hullabaloo, which is of no use as spectators can recognize the real occurrences. The first half moves in a detailed manner while the second half in a typical thrilling style, moves very quickly.

Kamaljeet Negi’s cinematography, special effects and art direction is skillfully portrayed; however, numerous scenes will remind you the camera work and warfare scenarios of various Hollywood movies. Nonetheless, Sircar seemed at his best to control the fast pace and quick jumps of the film from one site in Sri Lank to another one in India and to other foreign locations.

As far as the performance is concerned, the big cast is handled brilliantly by Sircar. John Abraham tried to portray a disturbed, gloomy and helpless angry-man with some maturity, but it could have been done with a lot of better emotional expressions and body language. Nargis Fakhri looks subtle in a small role and appears as fresh breath in the midst of high-pitched drama. Rashi Khanna’s role as John’s wife, doesn’t add any significant dimension except it was a slight shadow of melodrama.

Madras Cafe has an unconventional soundtrack which is appropriate with the rhythm of the movie. Composer Shantanu Moitra followed the main theme in accordance with the script.

The film lacks in certain areas. Such as, at the start, a grand conspiracy was introduced as the focal point, but as the movie progresses, the focal point shifts to other events. Eventually the thrilling story diverts to something else leaving behind the conspiracy. Likewise, there is no explanation for “the main events that changed the political history of India”. There are too many flashbacks that spoil the continuity, moreover the film lacks sensational tinge towards the ending.

Similarly, Fakhri’s English dialogues in response to John’s Hindi dialogues are quite perplexing for me. Why she is responding in English when she can understand Hindi? – only Sircar can tell us the mystery behind it.

Overall, the politics, rebellion, espionage, human-tragedy, suspense and nicely handled narrative are examples of commendable exertion and a sincere effort by Shoojit Sircar. If you neglect minor flaws, Madras Café is a must-watch.

It stands distant from the run-of-the-mill Bollywood underground gangs/bhai-log thrillers. John Abraham’s Madras Cafe is not suitable for Masala film fans, as it provides an exceptionally serious drama with political twists.

Writer: Tanveer Khadim
Source: www.thenews.com.pk
Read More

Saturday, August 31, 2013

The Wolverine: an Indestructible Masterpiece

The Wolverine: an Indestructible Masterpiece




Director James Mangold brings a furrowed-brow solemnity to the comic-book world of Marvel’s blade-fisted antihero, The Wolverine. One that scratches and claws against the law of diminishing returns always destined to beset the splintering X-Men franchise.

Inspired by the 1982 Chris Claremont & Frank Miller Wolverine miniseries, “The Wolverine” takes enough liberties to better adapt it to the Marvel X-Universe that Fox has been building towards.

Haunted by the death of Jean Grey, former X-Man Logan (Hugh Jackman) is now a loner, foraging in the woods. But he’s tracked down and brought to Japan by a billionaire who’s keen to repay a life debt by stripping the Wolverine of his immortality.

Yukio (Rila Fukushima), a katana-wielding assassin with an intriguing back-story of her own, accompanies Logan to Tokyo, where he meets his would-be benefactor, Lord Yashida (Hal Yamanouchi), now an elderly mega-rich industrialist who wishes to repay his debt to Wolverine. Not willing to embrace death, he offers Logan a chance to relieve him of his eternal suffering in an exchange for his healing abilities. Logan refuses to do so – believing it to be a curse rather than a gift – only to be drawn into a web of intriguing mystery that needs unraveling.

Mark Bomback and Scott Frank’s screenplay follows Chris Claremont and Frank Miller’s popular Japan-set comic-book arc from 1982, but Mangold of “3:10 to Yuma” fame seeks to distance his film from those pulpy beginnings by embedding his protagonist in a conventional, near bromidic drama of familial squabbling, corruption and corporate greed.

Until a third act that collapses in a harebrained heap, the director largely succeeds in keeping the more fatuous aspects at bay, roughing up the surface with organically staged fight scenes and, raising the stakes by stripping his hitherto indestructible hero of his self-healing and regeneration powers.

Figuratively declawed, the Wolverine stumbles and bleeds, that intricately sculpted body which is hurting in tune with his inner torment.

That said,  ’The Wolverine’ is that rare superhero film that is mindful of the cannon but works excellently as a rousing standalone action picture with a lot of heart and soul to it. Hugh Jackman like many before him – such as Robert Downey Jr. (Iron Man), Christian Bale (Batman) and Sean Connery (James Bond) – has made Wolverine his own. With the right mix of vulnerability, steel and extremely buffed body, he creates an emotionally wounded superhero we can look up to and identify with.

The action set pieces from the dropping of the atomic bomb in the beginning, to the fight on the bullet train and the slightly silly climax are suitably gob-smacking. Unlike its predecessor the action in this movie is nicely balanced with the quieter moments and meditations of mortality.

Despite being an improvement on the last outing for Jackman’s not-so-merry mutant the movie leaves you with a sense of unfulfilled desire.

Regardless, the X-Men film series that started promisingly and then spun into a dive and was successfully rebooted thanks to the prequel “X-Men: First Class” is now at a point where the franchise has been snicked into strands so twisted from each other that its getting tough to trace the genealogy. Inconsistency is inevitable in a world that’s constantly being dug up with new characters and done over, leaving us no time to fall in love with anything being flung at us.

Heroes wander in, heroes wander out. Wolverine – the indestructible centerpiece of the buffet’s spread – isn’t waning, but Box Office results show otherwise. Here a superhero strives to be ordinary. As Marvel continues to claw the character’s mystique away, he’s starting to get his wish.

Source: www.thenews.com.pk
Reviewed by: Hasan Ahmed Ansa
Read More